Center Bank

Deciding whether you should invest spare money or use it to pay off debt can be a practical dilemma. It might feel attractive to use the money to invest since that might earn you a higher return but paying off debt always remains the safer alternative. I always recommend paying off debt unless you can earn substantially more by investing. Do not take the risk of investing if it’s only going to net you 1% or 2% more than paying off the debt. It’s not worth it since there’s always a chance that the market might go down. By paying off the debt you have a guaranteed return.

This article explains the finance math clearly, covers different debt types, shows worked examples, examines tax and employer match effects, and offers a usable decision process so you can pick a plan that fits your money situation and risk tolerance.

If you want to learn more about investing in general then I recommend you visit Investing.co.uk. Investing.co.uk is a British website but most of their information is valuable no matter where you live. Only strictly geographic information, such as information about UK ISA accounts and UK brokers, is strictly UK relevant.

The core tradeoff in one sentence

This is a question about safety versus potential return. Investing the money can be more profitable but paying off debt gives you secure returns since you no longer have to pay the interest. You will know how much money you save by paying off the debt but you can never be certain how much you will earn from investing your money. You will also have to consider the fact that you will have to pay tax on the money you invest unless you use a tax-free investment account such as an ISA account.

Investigating only makes sense if you will earn more than you will pay in interest, even after you pay taxes. You should also add a premium for the risk that you are taking by investing. You should therefore need to make a clear profit from investing instead of paying off debt to consider this alternative. I recommend that you price the risk at at least 2-5 percentage points. If you cannot profit more than that from investing it instead of paying off the debt, then you should pay off the debt. An even higher risk premium is advisable in potential bubble markets.

Types of debt and why they matter

Not all debt is the same. High cost unsecured debt—credit cards, many personal loans and payday credit—typically carries interest rates that are higher than plausible long term after tax equity returns. That makes them first priority for repayment. Medium cost debt such as many personal loans, store cards, or unprotected overdrafts usually still favors payoff unless you have an unusually strong, low cost investment opportunity. Lower cost or tax advantaged debt—most mortgages, some student loans, and certain low rate fixed term loans—often changes the comparison because the interest rate is low and in some regions part of the interest may be tax deductible. If a mortgage rate is 2.5 percent and you expect a net 5 percent after tax from equities, investing could produce higher expected wealth, but the analysis must include liquidity and risk. Secured debt can also bring nonfinancial consequences: defaulting on a mortgage risks losing your home and eviction, so its practical cost can be larger than the stated interest rate if you miss payments.

Safety of paying off debt

Paying debt is arguably the safest financial choice because it produces a guaranteed real economic benefit: you eliminate a contractual future outflow. If you repay a loan that charges 6 percent per year you have effectively earned a 6 percent risk free return for the money you used, because you no longer have to pay that interest. That guarantee is particularly valuable when household cash flow is tight, when interest rates are high, or when missing payments would create severe nonfinancial harm. Eliminating a monthly payment also improves free cash flow and reduces the likelihood of falling into further arrears. For people who value certainty or who carry expensive or variable rate debt, paying it down first protects the balance sheet in a way that volatile market gains cannot.

How to compare the numbers — a clear example

Do the arithmetic before you act. Let’s look at an example: you have £10,000 that you can use to invest or to pay off debt at 6 percent interest. if you invest the money you are considering investing it in a broad diversified equity index fund expected to return 8 percent annually before tax and fees. When we know this we can calculate which alternative is better.

One year example, step by step:

1. Interest saved by paying debt for one year:
   10,000 × 0.06 = 600. So paying the debt saves 600 in interest that year.
2. Expected investment gain in one year at 8 percent:
   10,000 × 0.08 = 800.
3. Gross difference before tax and fees:
   800 − 600 = 200. Investing would be 200 better on expectation for that year.

But that simple arithmetic ignores tax and fees. If you expect 25 percent tax on short term gains and 0.5 percent in fees from funds, compute net investment return:

4. Tax on gain: 800 × 0.25 = 200. Net after tax = 800 − 200 = 600. Subtract fees 10,000 × 0.005 = 50. Net = 600 − 50 = 550.
5. Compare net investment gain 550 to interest saved 600. Now paying debt is better by 50.

This shows why you must net out taxes and costs; a seemingly large premium in nominal expected return can vanish after realistic deductions. Over longer horizons compounding changes things but tax and behavioral slippage continue to matter.

Five year compounding example, with simple compounding and no intermediate deposits, computed year by year to avoid arithmetic error:

Start principal P = 10,000.

Investment at nominal 8 percent not taxed until disposition for simplicity: after 5 years value = P × (1 + 0.08)^5. Compute stepwise:

1 + 0.08 = 1.08
1.08^2 = 1.1664
1.08^3 = 1.259712
1.08^4 = 1.360488
1.08^5 = 1.469328

Value = 10,000 × 1.469328 = 14,693.28 Gain = 4,693.28.

Debt at 6 percent, remaining obligation if you did not pay down: interest cost over 5 years if you left the debt constant (no amortisation), total interest = 10,000 × 0.06 × 5 = 3,000. Net difference before taxes and fees = 4,693.28 − 3,000 = 1,693.28. This is the profit you made from investing rather than paying off debt. It’s a profit but it might not be big enough to justify the risk of staying in the stock market for five years rather than choosing a safe route and just paying off the debt.

But again, apply tax and fees assumptions, and remember that many loans amortise which reduces interest exposure over time. The point is: compounding can favor investing when the expected net after tax returns comfortably exceed the interest rate for a sustained period, but careful arithmetic is essential.

Employer match and tax advantaged accounts change the math strongly

Employer matching on retirement plans is functionally an immediate return that is hard to beat. For example if your employer matches 50 percent on contributions up to a limit, that is a guaranteed 50 percent return on the contributed amount before market moves. When you compare paying debt to investing, always capture the match first. Use the simplest rule: contribute at least enough to get the full employer match before aggressively paying down low interest debt. The same logic applies to tax advantaged accounts where tax treatment boosts net returns. If you can shelter gains or contributions from tax in an ISA or a pension, the after tax expected return on investing may exceed the nominal comparison and make investing preferable even with some low cost debt remaining.

Liquidity and optionality — why people pay debt despite math

Even if expected investment return is higher, paying debt provides liquidity benefits that investing does not. A paid off loan reduces monthly cash obligations and increases free cash flow, which gives optionality to weather job loss or to take new opportunities. Investments can lose value at the worst moment forcing either partial sales at depressed prices or maintaining the loan while the portfolio recovers. For many households the psychological relief of lowering debt and the increase in guaranteed future disposable income is a decisive factor. That is a rational preference even when expected mathematical return from investing is higher.

Behavioral considerations and the discipline premium

Behavior matters. If investing temptations lead you to undersave or to increase leverage while carrying debt, the theoretical advantages vanish. Conversely, some people cannot resist compulsive debt avoidance and pay down low cost mortgage debt at the expense of missing employer match and long term gains; that choice is psychologically consistent and can be defensible, but it is a different risk profile. A pragmatic compromise is to form rules that force both behaviours: capture employer match, maintain a small liquid emergency buffer, then split remaining spare cash with a fixed allocation to debt repayment and to investing. That creates progress on both fronts and reduces the chance that behavioural impulses derail the plan.

Practical decision framework

Apply a short checklist before you choose.

• First, identify the effective interest rate on each debt after fees and tax deduction if any. For variable rate debt consider likely future shock scenarios.
• Second, estimate your realistic after tax expected investment return net of fees for the horizon you care about.
• Third, prioritise eliminating very high cost debt.
• Fourth, secure the employer match and tax advantaged account advantages.
• Fifth, ensure you have an emergency buffer of three months minimum or more if your job is unstable.
• Sixth, if debt rates exceed expected after tax net returns, pay debt. If expected net returns significantly exceed debt cost and you have the buffer and match captured, investing can be rational.

Hybrid approaches and examples

A hybrid approach preserves optionality. For many people a practical plan starts by setting aside an emergency fund equal to three months of expenses and contributing the minimum to capture any employer match. With that in place allocate extra spare cash with a fixed split. If you choose a 60 to 40 rule where 60 percent of extra cash pays debt and 40 percent invests, you will reduce high rate debt faster while still taking advantage of market growth potential and compounding. Alternatively use a ruleset tied to thresholds: once a debt’s interest rate falls below a target you shift all new cash to investing. These rules give disciplined progress without requiring you to pick a single absolute winner.

Taxes, inflation and the real return view

Do not ignore inflation and tax. If your loan is fixed at 3 percent and inflation runs 2 percent, the real cost of the loan is roughly 1 percent. If equities are expected to return 6 percent nominal with 2 percent inflation and 30 percent taxes, the real after tax return shrinks further. Always convert nominal assumptions into real after tax numbers before comparing to your debt cost. That ensures apples are compared to apples.

When to prioritise payoff even if investing looks better on paper

There are clear reasons to pay down debt despite an attractive investing case. If missing payments would trigger penalties, repossession or job jeopardy pay debt. If your cash flow is fragile or you lack a meaningful emergency buffer pay debt first to reduce monthly strain. If the debt is large and variable rate such that a shock could quickly raise payments, reducing exposure is prudent. If you dislike volatility and having leverage magnifies stress then paying debt is a rational choice that improves wellbeing even if it sacrifices expected financial upside.

Execution: how to implement a plan

Once you choose, implement it in writing. Automate either the loan overpayment or the investment contributions. Use a single transfer rule so emotion does not redirect cash.

Keep track of your progress and revisit and review the total investment or debt repayments regularly. As your reality changes it’s important that you also adjust your plans. If the interest rate of your debt increases, then it might be better to move your investments over as an extra debt payment.

If your interest rate goes down, it might be good to start investing instead of paying extra on your debt.

If you have reasons to suspect that the market is in a bubble and might crash, then it might be better to just remove your investments from the markets altogether and either keep them as cash or use them to pay off your debt. Remember that avoiding losses is worth just as much as earning a return and it is impossible to time the market. The market might continue to go up for a while but if you are able to avoid a future crash that takes the stock back down below the level where you sold, then you are still better off.

Final comments on risk and return

The finance math is straightforward once you net out tax and fees and use realistic return assumptions. The safe option is paying debt because it produces a guaranteed return equal to the interest avoided and reduces cash flow obligations. The potentially higher return option is investing, but only when expected net returns are sufficiently above debt cost and you have the liquidity and temperament to accept market swings. Many households find a hybrid approach the most practical: secure employer match, establish an emergency buffer, pay down the most expensive debts aggressively, and direct a portion of leftover cash to diversified investing.